On the other hand....

First thing every morning, our street people regulars get their only exercise for the day...as they race each other up the Grand Stairway to Periodicals to get the three copies of the local paper and the one USA Today.

Thereafter, it's a matter of rotation for turns. They watch each other like hawks...vultures?...till someone returns a copy to the desk. And new arrivals glance under the desk where they know we keep the papers and shrug.

Just a moment ago, though, there was a comic twist to the usual with a new arrival.

He glanced under the desk, saw no papers, and shrugged.

Then he saw what looked like a paper lying on the desk.

"What's this?" he asked.

As soon as he realized that it was the Sunday Classified Job Listings, though, he waved his hand dismissively and went on over to the armchairs.

Ah, public service!

Can I go home now?

Attitude adjustment

Yeah, it's been a while.

And it looks pretty sorry that I got a Blog Award and then immediately vanished for four months.

Phyllis Diller used to say, "See this body? There's no excuse for this body. Lots of reasons, but no excuse!"

Well, substitute "blog" for "body" and....

But I have been busy. In fact, that busyness has nudged me through several successive layers of attitude adjustment.

When I look back to just before I took time out from this blog, I find a post called Vulnerability. The core of it was this passage:

You could call [this vulnerability] "thinned-skinnedness," except that's not quite it. The issue is personal boundaries and how strong they are, how permeable yet resilient they are.

Perhaps the more relevant term is empathy. Those of us who are sensitive to the wants and feelings of others are also vulnerable to them. At our best we hone the skills of being just open enough to others to be helpful, without being so open that our own boundaries are invaded.

Which brings us to burnout.

I went to library school in 1999, after resigning in despair from the clinical counseling career which I loved, yet which had burned me out....

Now I struggle daily as one anxious, demanding person after another comes to the Ask Here desk, needing help to seek and apply for email accounts, unemployment benefits, jobs, food stamps....

And I resent them. I catch myself wandering around the stacks muttering, "I HATE this job!" I want them to leave me alone so that I can "get my work done...."

Whoa! That's burnout.

And for me, it's a warning of a deeper challenge. I'm realizing how much—way more than I thought—the scars of my earlier burnout have gotten in the way of genuinely practicing empathy.

That "scars of earlier burnout" bit is the revelation.

It’s taken me nine years...ten, if you count library school...to realize how far I had retreated from being able to maintain that permeable yet resilient boundary.

I haven't been feeling very empathetic toward customers. Just obligated in a tired professional sense. Obligated either by their demanding attitude of entitlement, or by my awareness that they genuinely needed help which I didn't feel up to giving.

Fortunately, I started to break through this impasse during the summer. Ironically, the six weeks subbing as manager of the little African-American neighborhood branch was actually the key to opening myself to new possibilities—rather than being the awful responsibility I had feared.

My more mature awareness recognizes that what I fear about supervisory responsibility is the necessity of taking a stand with customers (or staff) and saying "yes" or "no." I've lived a life of avoiding conflict…and, hence, of avoiding situations in which I am the designated person responsible for dealing with conflict.

"But wait a minute," you say. "Didn't you work 'on the yard' in a medium/maximum security men's prison for 12+ years?"

Well…um…yes. And I constantly surprised myself with my ability to stand up to inmates (and staff) in a professional, non-violent way, and say "yes" or "no." In other words, the innate ability is there. It's the feelings that get in the way.

Back to that word "vulnerability."

When any of us aren't certain, at that subconscious gut level, that we can protect our own boundaries, it feels unsafe to take a stand. This isn't really about knowing the right answer, though my fear is likely to mislead me into believing that to be the issue.

The former manager of Main Library gave me a great gift one time, when I was telling her about a difficult situation I'd had to handle as designated Person in Charge (PIC). I had acknowledged my discomfort with being unsure what was the "right thing to do" in that situation.

She said: "Mike, when you're Person in Charge, you are in charge. Just do what you think is best at that moment. As long as I can see that you are acting to protect people and property, I'll back you up."

I experienced this silly, wonderful sort of "aha" as the weight slipped off my shoulders. It was as if the overbearing inner policeman who's chronically after me for "not knowing" had been outranked…as he had indeed been…by someone with real authority.

What my manager was reminding me of was what I knew all through those prison years: real authority is about personal authority, not about having a title and enforcing the rules.

And, of course, this truth applies to all of us, not only to supervisors or PICs or managers. In any and all life situations, the real effect of our presence with other people depends upon our having the courage and faith to use our personal authority…to act out of personal integrity and a sense of fairness, not out of "being right."

One incident from a month or so ago demonstrates what I mean.

I was back at Main Library, PIC on a Saturday—a circumstance I usually dread, since not only am I PIC but most of the other supervisors, especially the circulation supervisor, are not at work.

I got the call:

An angry customer, furious because her card was blocked because the drop-box address she had used as a homeless person when getting that card five months ago is now not considered adequate but she had just paid over $17 in fines in order to unblock her card so she could get online to do coursework her counselor had recommended so she could get a job and….

You get the picture.

And somehow, thanks to some sort of grace, I just handed her my business card and said, "I understand, ma'am. I can't change the policy, but I want to find some way to help you get online today."

After finding no one else "more" in charge than I to ask for help, I went back to Circ desk and gave her a free Guest Pass for the day.

She, meanwhile, had calmed down. She apologized for her angry rant.

Then she said she gets some mail at her aunt's address.

I said, "Oh, well, bring some of that mail in Monday, and we can use that address on your account."

She left satisfied.

I left flying.

There's something about setting aside the fear of having boundaries invaded, the fear of "not knowing the right thing."

Something about just saying, "Here are the rules, but let's you and me together figure out some way to get what you most need without breaking the rules (if we can)."

It's that "let's be allies in this" shift that makes the difference.

The situation stops being my boundary versus yours. It stops being a boundary situation.

It becomes two (or three, or more) people puzzling out an awkward challenge, compromising, making do.

At such moments, for a change, I don't have to ask, "Can I go home now?"

Thanks,
Mike

Blog award

I'm one of those people who tends to break chain letters and often fails to forward or respond to Internet memes.

This isn't out of meanness or any sort of anti-superstitious inclinations.

("If you don't send this letter to 10 friends, your cat will die in a bizarre shaving accident!")

Even though I use computers and social software all day long—or perhaps because of that—not passing along memes is primarily a matter of simplicity practice.

I appreciate the thoughts and sentiments of those who share memes, but I remember the emperor who agreed to give a peasant one grain of rice on the first square of the chess board, twice that on the second, twice that on the third...and so on.

However, it seems a grateful think to do to acknowledge that someone I don't even know has nominated The Surly Librarian for a blog award.

I got a nice comment on the previous post from Gil S, an English Quaker in Reading, outside of London, directing me to a kind nomination on Stumbling blocks to stepping stones.

Gil writes: "I spent my working life in libraries and can often relate to Mike, The Surly Librarian."

(You can read more about Gil on Stumbling blocks, but the subtitle itself is informative: "A way of extending the spiritual autobiography project I have been engaged in for over 30 years and exploring where Quakers and my Inward Teacher have taken and are taking me.")

Here are the simple guidelines for the blog award/meme: first nominate seven other blogs for the award and then meme seven things about yourself.

My blog reading is all over the map, and I'm not sure whether to focus on bloggers I know or to point to bloggers whom I value yet know less personally. My hunch is to mix it up.

First comes Acrentropy, by my colleague "Alonzo Mosley (FBI)," whose neighborhood library branch I am babysitting while he practices being a new daddy. A wonderful mix of humor, political sarcasm, Lego, and original video mash-ups. ("Alonzo" also maintains The La-La Land Library, the best entertainment web directory I know.)

There are a few library and information science blogs I've written up elsewhere in my posts, and they seem worth nominating here. I've cited Michael Stephens' Tame The Web: Libraries, Technology and People a number of times. Also Brian Herzog's Swiss Army Librarian. And, an always fascinating blog about "information architecture," Peter Morville's findability.org.

For insightful, progressive political commentary on the inside track, Steve Clemons at The Washington Note.

For a Quaker blog which inspires and uplifts me, Quaker Pagan Reflections, by Cat Chapin-Bishop and Peter Bishop. One of those marvelous cases of finding best friends in cyberspace whom I've never (yet) met face to face (though we have chatted by phone, email and facebook).

Also uplifting, a blog by Brain Andreas called Zen Bandit (see also his Story People and a post of mine about Brian's work).


Oy! Now I have to tell seven things about myself?!

• I'm left handed.
• My middle name is Austin, my Dad's first name. When I finally realized in my mid-30s that I knew how to be an adult, I started signing my full name (instead of middle initial "A"), in order to show my appreciation and gratitude for Dad.
• My spouse Jim and I have known each other since high school in 1965, we've been a couple since 1985, and we were married under the care of our Quaker meeting in 1994.
• I'm a cat person.
• I collect crystals.
• I'm sometimes even more grouchy than I let on (ask Jim or Trapdoor Spider).
• Life is all a blessing.

So there!

Mike

Stonewall: It's way past time

I don't usually do politics on this blog (except for the pink triangle on the sidebar), but today is the fortieth anniversary of the Stonewall Riots of 1969. I myself have been out as a gay man since 1973.

It's way past time that people of sexual minorities had full civil rights in this country. As one approach to this issue, let me share something called the Dallas Principles.

Preamble: President Obama and Congress pledged to lead America in a new direction that included civil rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans. We now sit at a great moment in our history that inspires the nation to return to its highest ideals and greatest promise. We face a historic opportunity to obtain our full civil rights; this is the moment for change. No delay. No excuses.

The following eight guiding principles underlie our call to action. In order to achieve full civil rights now, we avow:

1.Full civil rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals must be enacted now. Delay and excuses are no longer acceptable.

2.We will not leave any part of our community behind.

3.Separate is never equal.

4.Religious beliefs are not a basis upon which to affirm or deny civil rights.

5.The establishment and guardianship of full civil rights is a non-partisan issue.

6.Individual involvement and grassroots action are paramount to success and must be encouraged.

7.Success is measured by the civil rights we all achieve, not by words, access or money raised.

8.Those who seek our support are expected to commit to these principles.

I want all my readers to know how important this matter is and join the effort.

Thank you,

Mike

Vulnerability

This will probably be more than you wanted to know about me.

When I started this blog as a Learning 2.0 exercise, I was already a blogger of several years running.

In fact, I've been journaling in one form or another since high school (way back in another century). That means I have a private thirty-some-year archive of more about myself than even I want to know.

The important point, though, is that for me writing is a way of learning about myself. Journaling in the form of a blog is sometimes even more so.

Any writer cleans up his act when he's being autobiographical in print. However, when I started blogging, I challenged myself to tell interesting stories about myself in a way that

• was humorous and (one hopes) entertaining
• was honest, even when not literally factual
• revealed to me, by revealing to my readership, something about myself which I hadn't wanted to have to admit.

The something relevant to librarianship that's been on my mind for the past few months, the something which has been subverting my usual ability to "be professionally nice" to strangers [see blog subtitle], is my chronic sense of VULNERABILITY.

By "vulnerability" I don't mean the introverted temperament I described in "Customer service for curmudgeons." That preference for solitary activities—or for conversation with a few close friends—has always been part of my life, yet it hasn't prevented me from being very effective in a series of service careers: library and business administrative secretarial positions, prison counselor, librarian.

The old friend who first taught me how to intepret the Meyers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator also helped me to appreciate the paradox of the Extrovert-Introvert scale, and to understand why I, an introvert, could do so well in professions which call for strong skills at social interaction.

"An introvert," he said, "can watch an extrovert and learn how to behave in an extroverted manner...at least till he runs out of energy. However, when an extrovert watches an introvert, all he sees is someone sitting there."

[Note that this also applies to non-readers who watch someone read.]

The vulnerability I'm writing about is something else. You could call it "thinned-skinnedness," except that's not quite it. The issue is personal boundaries and how strong they are, how permeable yet resilient they are.

Perhaps the more relevant term is empathy. Those of us who are sensitive to the wants and feelings of others are also vulnerable to them. At our best we hone the skills of being just open enough to others to be helpful, without being so open that our own boundaries are invaded.

Which brings us to burnout.

I went to library school in 1999, after resigning in despair from the clinical counseling career which I loved, yet which had burned me out (due to a right-wing political "coup" in my home state which undid fifteen years of prison reform).

Well, we discovered in "Intro to Computers in Libraries" that almost half of the 60+ people in the course were either burned out social workers or burned out school teachers. We might have taken that as a warning. At the time we all just thought it was funny.

:-\

Now I struggle daily as one anxious, demanding person after another comes to the Ask Here desk, needing help to seek and apply for email accounts, unemployment benefits, jobs, food stamps..."free money." Though this is probably an exaggeration, it seems as if the majority of them are not just digital immigrants but digital refugees.

And I resent them. I catch myself wandering around the stacks muttering, "I HATE this job!" I want them to leave me alone so that I can "get my work done."

What's going on here?

It's taken me months to catch on. Just recently I realized: I've lost the knack of helping-while-sustaining-my-boundaries. As soon as someone comes to the Ask Here desk, I'm feeling as if my privacy has been violated.

Whoa! That's burnout.

And for me, it's a warning of a deeper challenge. I'm realizing how much—way more than I thought—the scars of my earlier burnout have gotten in the way of genuinely practicing empathy.

For the nine years I've been a librarian, I've thought of myself in the way I did when I was a competent clinical counselor: as an open, caring helper with well-maintained personal boundaries.

For the past half a year or so, though, I've felt much more like an old grouch who's lost his sense of humor. Worse, like a "helper" who is at best patronizing and at worst spiteful.

Not what I want.

"Well, counselor. Now that you have a diagnosis, what are you going to do about it?"

"No. The question is, 'What are you going to do about it?' "

I've already scattered clues to myself all through this blog, especially in the "Can I Go Home Now?" pieces and way back in that original, June 28, 2008, curmudgeon piece:

Fortunately, though, they sometimes manage to get through to me as actual people. It might be when they present their questions. It might be later, when my resentment of their "interrupting" me shifts into professional eagerness to search out the solution...

...which sometimes shifts into a genuine exchange of satisfaction with a real human being, when we both realized that we have tracked down—or at least stumbled across—the best answer to the query.

Even though it makes for good jokes in the workroom or on a blog, I'm not too proud of my curmudgeonly resentment of customers.

I am grateful, though, that they insist upon becoming human beings, so that I have to become human, too.

I guess that's another reason I'm in this line of work.

It ain't easy, being human.

Meanwhile, I'm affirming that the new assignment which I've been dreading—managing a neighborhood branch for five weeks while a colleague practices daddy-hood—may be the change of venue I need...especially since I slip out for a week's vacation in the middle of it.

We shall see.

As I said at the start, writing is a way of learning, especially writing I embolden myself to share with others.

Thank you for being readers.

And take a break. Nurse your own incipient burnout, if that's what's bugging you.

"They" are just "us" on the other side of the desk.

Take care,
Mike

Pearls before Swine, by Stephan Pastis

I seem to be stuck in a derivative loop, sharing other people's comedy rather than writing my own.

Maybe I've gotten tangled up in all the overlapping time travel disruptions of the new Star Trek (which I've seen) and the new Terminator (which I'm waiting to see).

Anyway....

This is worth sharing.


Ah, empathy....

Note: Stephan Pastis has a blog!

Dilbert, again

While I'm on the techie comics roll, here's another funny insider joke from Dilbert: