Tuesday, November 8, 2011

FDR's "Economic Bill of Rights"

Over the past few months I've been reading H.W. Brand's excellent 2008 biography, Traitor to His Class: The Privileged Live and Radical Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

As the Terry Hartle writes in his Christian Science Monitor review, the book is "detailed, insightful, and reads like a novel." More to the point, I keep finding myself longing for the complex and mature leadership this country received from FDR.

Yesterday I learned yet one more new thing about Roosevelt's determination to influence American politics for the better. In his January 11, 1944, State of the Union Address, he included what has come to be called the "Second Bill of Rights" (or "Economic Bill of Rights").

Here are images of the transcript from which Roosevelt read his radio address. Copied below is the text of that bill of rights, plus the words he spoke to underscore its importance.

Economic Bill of Rights, from FDR's 1944 State of the Union Address

Economic Bill of Rights, from FDR's 1944 State of the Union Address


This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our Nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. "Necessitous men are not free men." People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
  • The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;
  • The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
  • The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
  • The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
  • The right of every family to a decent home;
  • The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
  • The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
  • The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens. For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.

One of the great American industrialists of our day—a man who has rendered yeoman service to his country in this crisis-recently emphasized the grave dangers of "rightist reaction" in this Nation. All clear-thinking businessmen share his concern. Indeed, if such reaction should develop—if history were to repeat itself and we were to return to the so-called "normalcy" of the 1920's—then it is certain that even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of Fascism here at home.

I ask the Congress to explore the means for implementing this economic bill of rights—for it is definitely the responsibility of the Congress so to do. Many of these problems are already before committees of the Congress in the form of proposed legislation. I shall from time to time communicate with the Congress with respect to these and further proposals. In the event that no adequate program of progress is evolved, I am certain that the Nation will be conscious of the fact.

Our fighting men abroad—and their families at home—expect such a program and have the right to insist upon it. It is to their demands that this Government should pay heed rather than to the whining demands of selfish pressure groups who seek to feather their nests while young Americans are dying.

The foreign policy that we have been following—the policy that guided us at Moscow, Cairo, and Teheran—is based on the common sense principle which was best expressed by Benjamin Franklin on July 4, 1776: "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."

I have often said that there are no two fronts for America in this war. There is only one front. There is one line of unity which extends from the hearts of the people at home to the men of our attacking forces in our farthest outposts. When we speak of our total effort, we speak of the factory and the field, and the mine as well as of the battleground—we speak of the soldier and the civilian, the citizen and his Government.

Each and every one of us has a solemn obligation under God to serve this Nation in its most critical hour—to keep this Nation great—to make this Nation greater in a better world.
These are the words with which FDR ended that address, just months before D-Day.

We need to hear them again now.



Eleanor & Franklin Roosevelt

Addendum: From In Roosevelt History, the blog of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum, here is a post published on November 7, 2011, the 49th anniversary of Eleanor Roosevelt's death.

Friday, October 7, 2011

Crack Skull Bob:
Common Drawing Mistakes, No. 37

Sometimes we library folk need to borrow some comic relief from an outside source.

One of my favorite outside sources is Ruben Fletcher. His blog, Crack Skull Bob, is full of excellent sketches, and often his commentary is full of ironic humor.

Crack Skull Bob

Rubin has a sub-category of posts which he calls "Common Mistakes." It's a sort of advice-for-artists category with a surrealistic twist.

Here's my current favorite, with a spippet of the commentary:

Common Drawing Mistakes, No. 37, by Crack Skull Bob

You're drawing up a storm, in a crosshatching groove, and suddenly the whole thing comes down on you. It happens to experienced sketchers as well as novices....

Proper attention to drawing construction is what will prevent this tragedy from occurring. Add too much hatching to a flimsy structure, and you're just begging for trouble.
I love it.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

New pages on The Surly Librarian

In case you haven't noticed, this blog now has both an About page and a Favorite Rants page, in addition to the Home page.

The introductory text to the Favorite Rants page is important enough that I am reproducing it here:

Phyllis Diller
I take a couple of themes very seriously:
  • First, the quality of human interactions between library professionals and their clients is far more important than collections or technology
  • Second, the primary mandate of public libraries is to ensure free access to essential information, together with instruction on how to use it effectively, to those who cannot otherwise get or afford it (see Poor Richard Redux: A Manifesto).
These selected rants—and the whole blog, for that matter—are meant to get at the heart of genuine librarianship, which I believe requires authenticity, integrity and compassion.

And a sardonic sense of humor....
Have fun.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Vocabulary question #2

Can someone adumbrate with precision?

Eclipse in the shade, by E. Israel


[Spoiler alert: Don't cheat!]

A warning from the article on adumbrate by The Word Detective:

A cool word should have cool ancestors, or at least a nifty story about how its parents met (“I was raised Middle English, but one day a charming Romany verb came into our tavern…”).

But sometimes knowing a word’s history can dim one’s enjoyment. “Nice,” for instance, is a “nice” word meaning “pleasant or agreeable.” Too bad it originally meant “stupid” (from the Latin nescius, not knowing), eh?

And if I say that I’m “sanguine” about my favorite team’s prospects for the next season, I mean I’m cheerful and optimistic, which is quite a departure from the one of the word’s meanings in the 18th century, “causing or delighting in bloodshed.”

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Dead on

When I was playing around with vocabulary websites for the previous post, I stumbled onto The Word Detective by Evan Morris, who also produces My Favorite Word.

On his About page, Morris explains that his father was Editor-in-Chief of Grosset & Dunlap and also wrote a syndicated newspaper column called Words, Wit and Wisdom, answering readers’ questions about word origins and language usage. The Word Detective, based on Morris' own syndicated column, continues that tradition with scholarly yet comical results.

Excerpts from one entry will give you a sense of what I mean:
Dead to rights

Dear Word Detective: All the media and late-night jokesters are having a field day with the latest OJ escapade, of course. Several times I’ve heard or seen the phrase “this time they’ve got him dead to rights,” and I think we all understand what it means.... [Just] when and where did it come from? — Ken in Houston.


“Dead to rights” is indeed an odd expression, dating at least to the mid-19th century, when it was first collected in a glossary of underworld slang (“Vocabulum, or The Rogue’s Lexicon,” by George Matsell, 1859).

The first part of the phrase, “dead,” is a slang use of the word to mean “absolutely, without doubt.” This use is more commonly heard in the UK, where it dates back to the 16th century, than in the US. “Dead” meaning “certainly” is based on the earlier use of “dead” to mean, quite logically, “with stillness suggestive of death, absolutely motionless,” a sense we still use when we say someone is “dead asleep.” The “absolutely, without doubt” sense is also found in “dead broke” and “dead certain.”

The “to rights” part of the phrase is a bit more complicated. “To rights” has been used since the 14th century to mean “in a proper manner,” or, later, “in proper condition or order,” a sense we also use in phrases such as “to set to rights,” meaning “to make a situation correct and orderly” (“Employed all the afternoon in my chamber, setting things and papers to rights,” Samuel Pepys, 1662).

In the phrase “caught dead to rights,” the connotation is that every formality required by the law has been satisfied, and that the apprehension is what crooks in the UK used to call a “fair cop,” a clean and justifiable arrest. (“Cop,” from the Latin “capere,” to seize, has long been used as slang for “to grab” as well as slang for a police officer.)

Of course, there’s many a slip ‘twixt the cop and the lips of the jury, so we shall see. Wake me when it’s over.
See what I mean?

Full of real info, but it's a stitch to read.


Trivia bonus: Who can explain the meaning and origin of "it's a stitch"? Post a Comment.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Vocabulary Question #1

Can someone luxuriate standing up?

Sweet Dreams

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Ooooh, nooo...!

It's science project time again!

Worse news: I got the "radish question" again!

Fresh, organic radish bunch

Fortunately, this time I knew to ask if this was about chemical versus organic fertilizer and took my young client to the organic gardening books.

Whew!